Trang chủ

Thông tin tra cứu

MCB: 1210000003767

Pages: 191

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE

LIST OF FIGURES

ABBREVIATIONS

Chapter

1. Buddhist Philosophy and The Major Moments of Cosmology
2. The Cakravãla or Single World System : The Monastic Guide to Brahma’s Pure Realm

• The “Sãhasra-Cosmology” or “Cosmology of Thousands”: To Multiply What is Unified and Unify What is Multiple

1. The Drama of the “Sãhasra-Cosmology” and The “Path”
2. The “Asankhyeya-Cosmology” or “Cosmology of Innumerables” and The Teaching of Light
3. The Eschatology of The “Asankhyeya-Cosmo­logy”: Buddhas Numerous As The Sands of The Gangã

• Conclusion: Motion and Light
• Bibliographical Resources

BIBLIOGRAPHY

INDEX

PREFACE

             The following pages grow out of an interest I developed in the cosmologies of Buddhism when I first read the popular Bud­dhist text known as The Lotus of the True Law (Saddharma-pundarika). The boldness of imagery, the certainty of statement and the fantastic scenarios which accompany the sermons of the cosmic Buddha in this text were startling and incompre­hensible and required an explanation. None was to be found. Because of the central place which these speculations occupy, I imagined—correctly—that this was a topic worthy of future research and—incorrectly—that such research could be accom­plished expeditiously. Bright hopes dimmed.

          After many years of trying to unravel these mysteries, three facts became apparent:

• There were actually two discrete strands within these cosmological materials; those emphasizing time or motion as the basic cosmological metaphor and those emphasizing ima­ges of space and light.
• All phases of Buddhist cosmological speculation were closely related and each could not be understood apart from the others.
• The cosmologies of Buddhism did not exist in isolation, but were closely related to the broader scientific and theolo­gical speculations which captured the imagination of the entire Classical world—particularly the ancient sciences of mathe­matics and astronomy.

             As a result of bringing these various perspectives to bear on the problem of Buddhist cosmology, a coherent and convincing picture began to emerge. In the pages that follow, Buddhist cosmological speculation is presented in terms of four major moments: (1) the single world system, (2) the “cosmology of thousands,” (3) the “cosmology of innumerables,” and (4) the cosmologies of the Pure Land sects. The “cosmology of thousands” and the “cosmology of innumerable” are the two major strands of what I have termed the mathematical cos­mologies. They are the primary focus of this work for two reasons. First, they have provided the key with which to understand the intention behind the other Buddhist cosmologies. Second, it is the mathematical cosmologies which present the scientific basis of all Buddhist cosmological speculation in shar­pest relief.

           This work, then, is divided as follows. Chapter I presents the major moments of cosmological speculation in the history of Buddhist philosophy, their perception in modem scholarship and the major problems with these perceptions. Chapter II presents the outlines of the single world system with some general insights into the intention behind this perception of the universe. While the single world system is not the primary concern of this work, it is presented here in some detail in order to serve as a convenient reference and to show its relationship to other phases of Buddhist cosmological speculation. ‘Chap­ters III-IV present the outlines of the “cosmology of thousands,” provide the first effort at interpreting the central concept of this cosmology and analyze the key moments in the drama of salva­tion which are central to this cosmology. Chapters V-VI pre­sent the structures of the “cosmology of innumerables” to­gether with the radically changed drama of salvation to be found here. It is these chapters which constitute the core of this study and establish a clear distinction between the cosmologies of the Hĩnayãna and those of the Mahãyana as well as the scienti­fic basis underlying each. Chapter VII summarizes the key differences between the drama implicit in the two mathematical cosmologies, presents additional suggestions which cannot be fully developed in this work and attempts to expose the most basic issues which confront us in the study of the Buddhist cos­mologies. Finally, Chapter VIII presents a discussion of avail­able bibliography both as a summary of materials reviewed in this study and as a resource for future research.

            As a result of the publication of this work, I am able to formally acknowledge the debts I owe to those who have provided en­couragement and shaped my interests along the way. My debts are indeed great. My parents to whom this work is dedicated provided a home in which religion was a focus of personal concerns. At Wittenberg University, I was exposed to a healthy theological and philosophical reexamination of Western religio­sity and introduced to the study of “comparative religions.” I continue to feel a great debt of gratitude for my teachers during those years, especially to the memories of Milton Kleintop and Margaret Ermarth. In 1964, entered the University of Chicago to study the History of Religions. Among the persons I recall with gratitude and affection from this period are Joseph Haroutunian, Joseph Sittler, Frank Reynolds and J.A.B. van Buitenen. In addition it was an undeniable privilege to have been exposed to two of the great minds of the twentieth century—Paul Tillich and Mircea Eliade.

           Following my years in the university, I became a civil servant, a position I have found more challenging than I had imagined. It is no small debt that I acknowledge to the U.S. Department of Labor for providing me with a livelihood as well as with an opportunity to make a contribution, however small, over a period of ten years. During these years, my interest in scholar­ship has been kept alive in large part as a result of the encourage­ment of Alf Hiltebeitel. As a result, I am unable to fully acknow­ledge the debt which I owe to Alf both as a friend and as a teacher. It is almost certain that had it not been for his steady encourage­ment, this study would never have been completed. The catholi­city of his interests, his grasp of detail which is so important in coming to terms with the Indian materials, and his aggressive pursuit of bibliography have opened many avenues for me. Without his encouragement and example, this research would have foundered at many more points than it did.

          Finally, I would like to express my gratitude for everyone who has been my friend over the years of this research despite obstacles I placed in the way. In particular, I would like to acknowledge a special debt to Catherine Romano who listened at length to the tangled details of this project and who despite prudent doubts, had the sensitivity to celebrate with me when the threads finally became apparent.

• Trang đầu
• Trang trước
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• Trang kế
 Trang cuối